Analyzing Informational Text on:
Recall what you have learned in this Portfolio to write an analysis of the texts “Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World” by Yonathan Zohar and “Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon” by Rick Moonen. Use the prompts to guide your response.
In the texts “Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World” by Yonathan Zohar and “Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon” by Rick Moonen, the authors present contrasting views on the topic of genetically modified salmon. While Zohar argues for the benefits of genetically modified (GM) salmon in addressing world hunger, Moonen raises concerns about the potential risks and negative impacts of GM salmon on human health and the environment.
Zohar supports his argument by presenting scientific evidence and statistics. He states that GM salmon have the potential to grow faster and larger than conventional salmon, thus increasing food production and addressing the global food crisis. Zohar also mentions that GM salmon could be produced sustainably, reducing the need for wild fish as feed and minimizing the environmental impact of fishing.
On the other hand, Moonen expresses concerns about the safety of GM salmon for human consumption. He highlights the potential allergenicity of these modified fish, as well as the unknown long-term effects they may have on human health. Moonen also argues that introducing GM salmon into the ecosystem could lead to unintended consequences, such as the crossbreeding of GM fish with wild populations, disrupting natural ecosystems and endangering native species.
While both authors present valid points, it is clear that their views are influenced by their backgrounds and interests. Zohar, a professor of marine biotechnology, emphasizes the potential benefits of GM salmon in addressing world hunger. He focuses on the scientific advancements and potential solutions GM salmon can provide. On the other hand, Moonen, a chef and advocate for sustainable seafood, raises concerns about the potential risks and negative impacts of GM salmon on human health and the environment. He prioritizes the precautionary principle and the need to protect ecosystems and human well-being.
Overall, the analysis of these texts reveals a complex and multidimensional issue surrounding genetically modified salmon. While Zohar's argument for the potential benefits of GM salmon in addressing world hunger is persuasive, Moonen's concerns about the potential risks and negative impacts cannot be ignored. Further research and careful consideration of the potential long-term effects are necessary to make an informed decision about the use of genetically modified salmon and its impact on food security and environmental sustainability.