Portfolio: Analyzing Informational Text
Recall what you have learned in this Portfolio to write an analysis of the texts “Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World” by Yonathan Zohar and “Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon” by Rick Moonen. Use the prompts to guide your response.
Write a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. Explain why it is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information. Provide specific examples from the two texts.
Write a paragraph in which you explain why it matters when the two authors interpret the same facts differently. Using specific examples from the two texts, describe the impact of the authors’ differing interpretations of the facts on you as a reader.
Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including a conflicting point of view and evidence can have on readers. Give specific examples.
Experienced readers can use several steps to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. First, they need to carefully read both texts to understand the main arguments, supporting evidence, and any biases present. This involves critically examining the authors' credentials, intentions, and the sources they use. Next, readers can compare and contrast the information presented in both texts, looking for inconsistencies, contradictions, and gaps in the arguments. They should also fact-check and cross-reference the evidence used by both authors to evaluate its reliability and validity. Finally, readers can evaluate the reasoning and logic presented in both texts to determine the strength of the arguments. Recognizing and evaluating conflicting information is important for readers because it allows them to form a well-rounded and informed opinion on the topic.
In "Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World," Yonathan Zohar argues that genetically modified (GM) salmon can be a solution to world hunger by providing a sustainable and efficient way to produce food. In "Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon," Rick Moonen opposes the use of GM salmon, citing potential risks to human health and the environment. The differing interpretations of the same facts by the two authors matter because it highlights how different perspectives and biases can shape one's understanding and opinion on a topic. For example, Zohar emphasizes the potential benefits of GM salmon, such as increased food production, while Moonen focuses on the potential risks and unknown long-term effects. As a reader, the authors' differing interpretations of the facts can create confusion and uncertainty, making it necessary to critically evaluate the arguments presented and form an independent opinion.
Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive by demonstrating that the author has considered opposing viewpoints and has addressed them. This approach adds credibility to the argument and shows that the author is well-informed about the topic. In the two texts, both authors acknowledge the existence of opposing viewpoints but come to different conclusions. For example, Zohar acknowledges concerns about potential environmental impacts of GM salmon but argues that proper regulations and risk assessment can mitigate these risks. Moonen, on the other hand, sees these concerns as significant enough to reject the use of GM salmon altogether. By including differing points of view and evidence, readers are exposed to a broader range of perspectives and can make more informed judgments based on a comprehensive understanding of the topic.