Explain how this decision legally interpreted the Constitution prior to the civil rights movement.(1 point) Responses The decision used liberal constructionism by interpreting the amendment’s author’s intent to explain the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision used liberal constructionism by interpreting the amendment’s author’s intent to explain the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision used strict constructionism by explaining the federal power to legislate education within state borders. The decision used strict constructionism by explaining the federal power to legislate education within state borders. The decision used strict constructionism by refraining from attempting to decipher the intent behind the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision used strict constructionism by refraining from attempting to decipher the intent behind the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision used liberal constructionism by citing the precedent of separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.
The decision interpreted the Constitution prior to the civil rights movement by using strict constructionism. This meant that the court refrained from attempting to decipher the intent behind the Fourteenth Amendment and instead focused on the literal interpretation of the text. This approach limited the federal power to legislate education within state borders and allowed for separate but equal facilities to exist.
