Explain how this decision legally interpreted the Constitution prior to the civil rights movement.(1 point)
Responses
The decision used strict constructionism by refraining from attempting to decipher the intent behind the Fourteenth Amendment.
The decision used strict constructionism by refraining from attempting to decipher the intent behind the Fourteenth Amendment.
The decision used strict constructionism by explaining the federal power to legislate education within state borders.
The decision used strict constructionism by explaining the federal power to legislate education within state borders.
The decision used liberal constructionism by interpreting the amendment’s author’s intent to explain the Fourteenth Amendment.
The decision used liberal constructionism by interpreting the amendment’s author’s intent to explain the Fourteenth Amendment.
The decision used liberal constructionism by citing the precedent of separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.