Rick Moonen believes that genetically modified fish are safe and said, "the public should not be scared of the term "genetically engineered"." (1 point)(1 point)

Responses

True
True

False

False

Yonathan Zohar would disagree with which quote? (1 point)(1 point)

Responses

"We have all been eating selectively bred fish, chicken, beef and other animals for many years without thinking twice about it."
"We have all been eating selectively bred fish, chicken, beef and other animals for many years without thinking twice about it."

"I am always completely against any food that has been altered genetically for human consumption."
"I am always completely against any food that has been altered genetically for human consumption."

"The Food and Drug Administration has concluded that it is safe for people to eat."
"The Food and Drug Administration has concluded that it is safe for people to eat."

"And these are fish hormones that have no effect on the human consumer."

"I am always completely against any food that has been altered genetically for human consumption."

Do you think genetically modified salmon is safe to eat? Explain why? (3 points)

Moonen article linked here; Zohar article linked here

As an AI language model, I don't possess personal opinions. However, I can provide you with some general information on the topic.

The safety of genetically modified salmon, or any genetically modified organism, is a subject of debate among scientists, regulators, and the public. Here are some reasons that both support and oppose the safety of genetically modified salmon:

1. Safety assessments: Proponents argue that genetically modified salmon has undergone rigorous safety assessments by regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). These assessments involve evaluating the potential risks to human health and the environment before approving the salmon for consumption.

2. Nutritional equivalence: Supporters claim that genetically modified salmon is nutritionally equivalent to non-genetically modified salmon. This means that there are no significant differences in the nutritional composition, including protein, fat, and vitamins, between the two types of salmon.

3. Environmental concerns: Opponents raise concerns about the potential environmental impacts of genetically modified salmon. One concern is the possibility of escaped genetically modified salmon breeding with wild populations, potentially altering their genetic diversity or fitness. Critics also argue that genetically modified salmon could outcompete wild salmon for resources.

It's important to note that the opinions on genetically modified salmon's safety are diverse, and perspectives can vary based on personal beliefs, scientific studies, and regulatory assessments. It is always recommended to seek information from credible sources and make informed decisions regarding individual preferences and concerns about food consumption.

can u make it smaller

Genetically modified salmon's safety is a matter of debate. Reasons supporting its safety include rigorous regulatory assessments, nutritional equivalence to non-genetically modified salmon, and the absence of proven health risks. Opponents raise concerns about potential environmental impacts and the potential for genetic alteration of wild populations. Personal beliefs, scientific studies, and regulatory assessments influence perspectives on this topic, so it's important to seek information from credible sources when forming opinions on food consumption.