Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including a conflicting point of view and evidence can have on readers. Give specific examples from the text "Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World" by Yonathan Zohar and "Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon" by Rick Moonen
Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can greatly enhance its persuasiveness. When presenting both sides of an argument, readers are exposed to a fair and balanced examination of the issue, which can make them more engaged and open to considering different perspectives. In the texts "Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World" by Yonathan Zohar and "Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon" by Rick Moonen, the inclusion of conflicting viewpoints and evidence exemplifies this effect. Zohar argues that genetically modified salmon is the solution to global hunger, supporting his claim with scientific research indicating its nutritional benefits and potential to address food scarcity. On the other hand, Moonen opposes genetically engineered salmon, presenting evidence about the potential environmental risks and the uncertainties associated with the long-term effects of this technology. By presenting contrasting viewpoints and their supporting evidence, both authors cater to different readers with different concerns, creating a more persuasive and comprehensive argument that encourages critical thinking and thoughtful consideration.
