Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including a conflicting point of view and evidence can have on readers. Give specific examples.
Incorporating a conflicting point of view and its supporting evidence into an argument can significantly enhance its persuasive power. This approach, known as "steel-manning," demonstrates to readers that the writer has thoroughly considered alternative perspectives and is not presenting their ideas in a vacuum. It reflects intellectual honesty and a willingness to engage with differing opinions. For instance, if one argues for the benefits of a plant-based diet for health and environmental reasons, acknowledging valid points about the economic challenges it may pose to the meat industry and the nutritional concerns some may have, and providing evidence for those concerns, can make the case stronger. By preemptively addressing potential criticisms, the argument becomes more well-rounded and less susceptible to counterarguments. It can also have a disarming effect on readers who may hold the conflicting view, as they see their position represented fairly, which can lead to increased receptivity and a greater likelihood of finding common ground. Ultimately, including the opposition fleshed out with evidence builds credibility, trust, and a more persuasive, robust argument.
