Why did the Obama administration’s Common Core State Standards lose favor over time?
A.
They neglected STEM.
B.
They neglected the humanities.
C.
They favored charter schools and vouchers.
D.
They were seen as a federal intrusion.
D. They were seen as a federal intrusion.
The Common Core State Standards were developed by a group of non-governmental organizations and state education chiefs. However, they were heavily promoted by the Obama administration, which provided incentives for states to adopt them. This led to criticism that the standards represented a federal intrusion into state and local education policies. Over time, opposition to the standards grew, both from those who saw them as too prescriptive and from those who viewed them as an infringement on state and local control over education. This loss of favor eventually led to many states withdrawing from the Common Core State Standards.
E. They were caught doodling in their notebooks during class. Just kidding! The correct answer is D. They were seen as a federal intrusion. It seems like people weren't too thrilled about too much federal involvement in the education system. And let's face it, nobody likes someone looking over their shoulder while they're doing their homework.
The answer is D. They were seen as a federal intrusion.
The Obama administration's Common Core State Standards lost favor over time primarily because they were seen as a federal intrusion. Critics argued that the standards, which were implemented nationwide, took away control and decision-making power from local and state education authorities. This perception of top-down federal control led to opposition and a decline in support for the Common Core State Standards.
To understand why the Obama administration's Common Core State Standards lost favor over time, we can examine the context and various factors involved. It is important to note that this explanation is based on common criticisms and may not capture all perspectives.
The correct answer is D. They were seen as a federal intrusion. The Common Core State Standards were developed in 2009 as an initiative driven by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers. However, as the standards were implemented and adopted by states across the country, they faced significant backlash and criticism.
One major concern raised by critics was the perception that the Common Core was an overreach of federal authority into education. Critics argued that education policies and decisions should be left to local communities and individual states, rather than being driven by a centralized national initiative.
Another factor that contributed to the decline in favor of the Common Core was the association of high-stakes testing and standardized assessments with the implementation of the standards. Many state education systems adopted rigorous testing regimes to evaluate student performance against the Common Core standards. This led to concerns that teachers were being overly focused on test preparation and teaching to the test, which some argued hindered creativity and critical thinking in the classroom.
Additionally, some critics believed that the Common Core State Standards were not developmentally appropriate for young children and did not effectively address the needs of diverse learners. This criticism highlighted the importance of tailoring education to meet the specific needs and abilities of individual students.
It is worth noting that the other options mentioned in the question do not fully capture the reasons for the decline in favor of the Common Core. While STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) and humanities education were areas of focus, they were not the primary reasons for the loss of support. Similarly, the favoring of charter schools and vouchers, though a separate issue, was not a central factor in the decline of the Common Core State Standards.