1.Choose the method a historian would use when thinking about the unique beliefs and viewpoints of an author and how they could influence their source.
a.frame of reference
b.diverse perspectives
c.point of view
d.historical context
2.Explain the method a historian would use when they are thinking about an author’s feelings or action that favors one thing over another.
a.bias
b.point of view
c.frame of reference
d.historical context
3.Why is it important to use primary sources when conducting historical research for analysis?
a.Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher.
b.Primary sources are the only way to learn anything about the past.
c.Primary sources are created out of many different sources and thus provide the best information for researchers.
d.Primary sources make connections between different types of information, which can help researchers.
4.Which answer choice best explains how historians use their analysis of sources to create a question for further inquiry?
a.Historians consider voices and points of view that are missing from the narratives of history in current sources..
b.Historians must form their own bias when conducting research in order to form new questions..
c.Historians consult one or two sources in order to develop a research question.
d.Historians research questions that have already been answered.
5.Which statement best summarizes the importance of considering multiple perspectives in the study of history?
a.Multiple perspectives ensure a more complete view of an event or topic.
b.A singular perspective is OK as people experience events in different ways.
c.Some views of an event or topic are more important than others.
d.It is harder to communicate clearly about a topic when multiple perspectives are included.
1. The method a historian would use when thinking about the unique beliefs and viewpoints of an author and how they could influence their source is c. point of view. Historians consider the perspective from which a source is written, taking into account the author's background, beliefs, and opinions that might have influenced their account.
To determine the point of view, historians analyze the author's language, tone, and choice of words in the source. They also look for any personal bias or subjective interpretation that might be present. By understanding the author's point of view, historians can assess the reliability and potential limitations of the source.
2. The method a historian would use when they are thinking about an author's feelings or actions that favor one thing over another is a. bias. Bias refers to the tendency of an individual to favor certain ideas, perspectives, or outcomes over others.
Historians recognize that authors may have biases that influence their writing, such as political or personal beliefs. To identify bias, historians analyze the language, tone, and content of the source and compare it with other perspectives and sources. By understanding the author's bias, historians can better assess the objectivity and reliability of the source.
3. The reason it is important to use primary sources when conducting historical research for analysis is a. Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher. Primary sources are original documents or artifacts created during the time period being studied. Examples include diaries, letters, photographs, government records, and eyewitness accounts.
Primary sources provide direct evidence and insights into historical events and the people involved, offering a more authentic and detailed understanding of the past. By examining primary sources, historians can gain firsthand information about the context, motivations, and perspectives of the people who lived during that time.
4. The answer choice that best explains how historians use their analysis of sources to create a question for further inquiry is a. Historians consider voices and points of view that are missing from the narratives of history in current sources.
Historians examine the available sources and analyze them critically to identify missing perspectives, biases, or gaps in the historical narrative. This analysis helps historians formulate new research questions that address the limitations or omissions in existing interpretations of history. By exploring diverse viewpoints and unheard voices, historians contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the past.
5. The statement that best summarizes the importance of considering multiple perspectives in the study of history is a. Multiple perspectives ensure a more complete view of an event or topic.
By considering multiple perspectives, historians can overcome the limitations of individual bias or limited sources. Different individuals and groups experience events in different ways, and their perspectives provide a more comprehensive understanding of historical events and their significance. Examining multiple perspectives allows historians to identify similarities, contradictions, and nuances in the historical record, enabling a more accurate and nuanced interpretation of the past.