1.Choose the method a historian would use when thinking about the unique beliefs and viewpoints of an author and how they could influence their source.
a.frame of reference
b.diverse perspectives
c.point of view
d.historical context
2.Explain the method a historian would use when they are thinking about an author’s feelings or action that favors one thing over another.
a.bias
b.point of view
c.frame of reference
d.historical context
3.Why is it important to use primary sources when conducting historical research for analysis?
a.Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher.
b.Primary sources are the only way to learn anything about the past.
c.Primary sources are created out of many different sources and thus provide the best information for researchers.
d.Primary sources make connections between different types of information, which can help researchers.
4.Which answer choice best explains how historians use their analysis of sources to create a question for further inquiry?
a.Historians consider voices and points of view that are missing from the narratives of history in current sources..
b.Historians must form their own bias when conducting research in order to form new questions..
c.Historians consult one or two sources in order to develop a research question.
d.Historians research questions that have already been answered.
5.Which statement best summarizes the importance of considering multiple perspectives in the study of history?
a.Multiple perspectives ensure a more complete view of an event or topic.
b.A singular perspective is OK as people experience events in different ways.
c.Some views of an event or topic are more important than others.
d.It is harder to communicate clearly about a topic when multiple perspectives are included.
CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME I NEED TO GET THESE RIGHT :)
How to study history? QC correct answers are the following:
1. frame of reference
2. bias
3. Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher.
4. Historians consider voices and points of view that are missing from the narratives of history in current sources.
5. Multiple perspectives ensure a more complete view of an event or topic.
1. The method a historian would use when thinking about the unique beliefs and viewpoints of an author and how they could influence their source is:
c. point of view
Historians consider the author's perspective and how that might shape their interpretation and presentation of information.
2. The method a historian would use when they are thinking about an author's feelings or action that favors one thing over another is:
a. bias
Historians analyze biases in an author's work to understand any personal inclinations or preferences that may influence their perspective and presentation of information.
3. The reason why it is important to use primary sources when conducting historical research for analysis is:
a. Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher.
Primary sources, such as diaries, letters, or eyewitness accounts, offer direct and immediate information from people who experienced or witnessed historical events, providing researchers with valuable insights and specific details.
4. The way historians use their analysis of sources to create a question for further inquiry is best explained by:
a. Historians consider voices and points of view that are missing from the narratives of history in current sources.
By critically analyzing existing sources, historians can identify narratives or perspectives that may be missing or underrepresented, prompting them to develop questions that address those gaps in understanding.
5. The statement that best summarizes the importance of considering multiple perspectives in the study of history is:
a. Multiple perspectives ensure a more complete view of an event or topic.
Considering multiple perspectives helps historians attain a comprehensive understanding of an event or topic by acknowledging different viewpoints, uncovering diverse interpretations, and accounting for the complexity of historical events.
1. The method a historian would use when thinking about the unique beliefs and viewpoints of an author and how they could influence their source is c. point of view. Historians consider the perspective from which an author writes, understanding that their personal beliefs and experiences can shape their interpretation of events.
To identify the point of view of an author, historians analyze the author's background, cultural values, and potential biases. They examine the author's political, social, or religious affiliations, as well as their personal experiences and motivations. By understanding the author's point of view, historians can determine how their unique beliefs and perspectives may have influenced the information they include or exclude from their source.
2. The method a historian would use when they are thinking about an author's feelings or action that favors one thing over another is a. bias. Bias refers to an inclination or prejudice towards a particular perspective or interpretation. Historians consider bias as they analyze sources and evaluate the reliability and accuracy of the information presented.
To identify bias in an author's work, historians look for indications of favoritism or a slant towards a particular viewpoint. They assess whether the author presents evidence fairly, acknowledges opposing arguments, or selectively chooses information to support their own position. By recognizing bias, historians can critically analyze the author's perspective and make informed judgments about the reliability and objectivity of the source.
3. The correct answer is a. Primary sources give firsthand accounts of events, which can provide important details to a researcher. When conducting historical research, primary sources play a crucial role in providing firsthand accounts and direct evidence of the events being studied. These sources include letters, diaries, photographs, speeches, official documents, artifacts, and other records created during the period under investigation.
By using primary sources, historians gain access to the perspectives, experiences, and thoughts of individuals who lived during the specific time period being studied. This firsthand information can provide important details, insights, and context that secondary sources (such as textbooks or articles written later) may not capture. It allows historians to analyze and interpret historical events using original, unfiltered evidence.
4. The answer is a. Historians consider voices and points of view that are missing from the narratives of history in current sources. When historians analyze sources, they look beyond what is explicitly stated to identify gaps or missing perspectives. They recognize that historical narratives can often be incomplete or biased, favoring certain viewpoints while omitting others.
By examining the silences or absences in historical sources, historians can create questions for further inquiry. They may seek to uncover the perspectives of marginalized groups or individuals, question dominant narratives, or explore alternative interpretations of events. This process of questioning and seeking missing voices helps historians expand their understanding of history and develop new research avenues.
5. The statement that best summarizes the importance of considering multiple perspectives in the study of history is a. Multiple perspectives ensure a more complete view of an event or topic. History is complex, and events can be interpreted differently depending on the viewpoints of the individuals involved. By considering multiple perspectives, historians gain a more comprehensive understanding of the nuances, motivations, and impacts of historical events.
Examining diverse viewpoints helps historians uncover different interpretations, biases, and motivations that may have shaped historical narratives. It allows for a more balanced analysis and helps challenge oversimplified or one-sided narratives. By considering various perspectives, historians can uncover hidden stories, identify areas of conflict or contradiction, and arrive at a more nuanced understanding of the past.