under the incorporation doctrine which of the following would be illegal for a state to do: A: criticize the commander in chief. B:establish a state church. C:tax the people.D:try people for murder

I think it would be Trying people for murder, or criticizing commander in chief, but most likely D

Under the incorporation doctrine, which applies the protections of the Bill of Rights to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, establishing a state church (B) would be illegal for a state to do. This is because the First Amendment prohibits the government from establishing a religion.

Criticizing the commander in chief (A) is protected by the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech, so it would not be illegal for a state to do.

Taxing the people (C) is a normal function of state governments and is not prohibited under the incorporation doctrine.

Trying people for murder (D) is part of the state's criminal justice system and is not prohibited by the incorporation doctrine. However, the state must adhere to constitutional requirements, such as providing due process and a fair trial, which are protected under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Under the incorporation doctrine, which is a legal principle that applies some of the protections of the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights to the states, the correct answer is B: establish a state church.

To understand this, let me explain how to arrive at the answer:

1. Read the question carefully: In this question, you are being asked which of the following actions would be illegal for a state to do under the incorporation doctrine.

2. Identify the options: The options provided are: A) criticize the commander in chief, B) establish a state church, C) tax the people, D) try people for murder.

3. Rule out options: Consider each option and eliminate those that are allowed under the incorporation doctrine.

- Option A: Criticizing the commander in chief is protected under the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech. Therefore, it would not be illegal for a state to do so.
- Option B: The establishment of a state church violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from establishing an official religion. Therefore, this action would be illegal under the incorporation doctrine.
- Option C: Taxing the people is a standard function of the government and is not specifically prohibited by the Constitution. Therefore, this action would be legal.
- Option D: Trying people for murder is a core function of the criminal justice system and is not specific to the incorporation doctrine or the Bill of Rights. Therefore, this action would also be legal.

4. Determine the correct answer: After considering all the options, we conclude that the correct answer is B: establish a state church, as it is prohibited by the incorporation doctrine's application of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause to the states.

In summary, under the incorporation doctrine, it would be illegal for a state to establish a state church. This is because the incorporation doctrine applies the protections of the First Amendment to the states, including the Establishment Clause, which prevents the government from establishing an official religion.