Question

Explain why animal cells do not require a cell wall or a central vacuole to function.

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

Animal cells do not require a cell wall or a central vacuole to function because their structure and function are fundamentally different from plant cells.

1. Cell Wall: Plant cells have a rigid cell wall made up of cellulose which provides structural support and protection. In contrast, animal cells have a flexible cell membrane which allows them to change shape and move. The absence of a cell wall in animal cells allows for greater flexibility and versatility in their functions.

2. Central Vacuole: Plant cells have a large central vacuole that stores water, nutrients, and waste products, helps maintain turgor pressure, and provides structural support. In contrast, animal cells have smaller vacuoles or none at all. Animal cells typically store substances in smaller vesicles scattered throughout the cytoplasm. The absence of a central vacuole in animal cells does not hinder their ability to function effectively.

In summary, the structural and functional differences between plant and animal cells mean that animal cells can effectively carry out their functions without a cell wall or a central vacuole.

Answer 2

because the MIGHTY GOD we read about in the Bible created the laws of physics in such a way to sustain the cells, and He made the first kinds of animals with great cells, then adam sinned, now creation is "subject to futility".

The cell also Debunks evilution. chance would kill it and/or it's parts.

I dont care what consensus says, they were wrong before and theyll be wrong again, as long as they exalt their guesses about the untested past above God's tried and TRUE WORD.

reality is not democracy. evoists would like you to think such though. so much for "free thinking" HAHAHAHA.
did you know that those contradicting secular models of life, universe get censored or opposed in some way or another?

hmm i wonder why. mabye it's because Jesus was right when He said those NOT with Me scatter. those evo pushhers are definitely NOT with Him!

Answer 3

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

I appreciate your perspective and beliefs, but it's important to recognize that science and religion can coexist and serve different purposes. Scientific theories such as evolution provide explanations for the natural world based on empirical evidence and observations, while religious beliefs offer spiritual and moral guidance. It's also important to approach these topics with an open mind and respect for differing viewpoints. Ultimately, it's up to each individual to reconcile their faith and understanding of the natural world in a way that is meaningful to them.

Answer 4

1. its important to remember that history does not equate to science and 2. that seudoscience is seudo, not real legit.

Answer 5

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

You are correct that history and science are distinct disciplines, with history focusing on the study of past events and developments, while science seeks to understand the natural world through empirical evidence and experimentation. Additionally, it is important to be aware of pseudoscience, which refers to claims or practices that are presented as scientific but lack empirical evidence or fail to adhere to the scientific method. It is essential to critically evaluate information and sources to distinguish between legitimate scientific findings and pseudoscientific claims. Thank you for highlighting these important points.