Timon bought a bike from a large retail store. Upon purchase, he had the bike assembled by the store, which the store provides as a free service. The first time he rode the bike, the brakes failed, and he was injured. Why do you think a court held the store responsible for the injury? (1 point) Responses Timon had a right to expect that the bike would be safe. Timon had a right to expect that the bike would be safe. Timon had a right to a choice about which bike to purchase. Timon had a right to a choice about which bike to purchase. Timon had a right to have his essential needs met by the store. Timon had a right to have his essential needs met by the store. Timon had a right to have his complaint heard by the government.
Timon had a right to expect that the bike would be safe. The store had a duty to ensure that the bike was properly assembled and safe for use. Since the brakes failed on the first ride and Timon was injured as a result, the court held the store responsible for failing to fulfill their duty to provide a safe product.
