Using arguments from the Modernisation theorists and those from Dependency theorists,
give a critical analysis of South Africa’s development story since 1994. Focus on the factors
that enabled the likes of Tintswalo to thrive while millions of others failed to realise similar
successes and what can be done to ensure that more citizens benefit from development
opportunities in democratic South Africa [100 marks].
Modernisation theorists would argue that South Africa has made great progress in terms of development since 1994. The country has experienced economic growth, improved infrastructure, and increased access to education and healthcare. Tintswalo is one example of a company that has thrived in this environment, benefiting from a stable political system and a growing market.
However, Dependency theorists would argue that this development has been uneven and unequal. While some, like Tintswalo, have been able to succeed, millions of South Africans still live in poverty and face significant barriers to development. This inequality is exacerbated by factors such as historically unequal access to resources, land, and education, as well as ongoing challenges such as corruption and weak governance.
To ensure that more citizens benefit from development opportunities in democratic South Africa, it is necessary to address these structural inequalities. This may involve implementing policies to redistribute wealth and resources more equitably, as well as investing in education and skills training to empower disadvantaged communities. Additionally, addressing issues such as corruption and promoting good governance will be essential in creating a more inclusive and sustainable development path for all South Africans.