The United States had no right to take over Hawaii, and to teach and force the American way on them. Hawaii had a stable government, own language, and an efficient way to educate the newer generation. While the United States forcefully took over Hawaii, Hawaii could benefit from this. Hawaii could have a more centralized government, able to participate in democracy, and would be a part of something much greater and stronger than they were. Later on, in the future, NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) would then be founded in 1949, NATO is an intergovernmental military alliance between 30 member states (countries), in simple terms, is an alliance between many countries to maintain peace, or to support each other if a war happens to break out. I cannot say whether the United States should or should not have annexed Hawaii, whether the United States did or did not, the future of Hawaii would be different, but if I had to say, Hawaii did benefit from this.
put this in 5 sentences