Question

Summarise:

Two arguments against the use of genome editing in reproduction are analysed, namely safety concerns and germline modification. These arguments are then contrasted with arguments in favour of genome editing, in particular with the argument of the child’s welfare and the argument of parental reproductive autonomy. In addition to these two arguments, genome editing could be considered as a worthy alternative to PGD as it may not be subjected to some of the moral critiques moved against this technology.

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

The safety concerns and ethical implications of genome editing in reproduction are discussed as arguments against its use. However, the potential benefits for the child's welfare and parental reproductive autonomy are considered as arguments in favor. Genome editing could also be seen as a potential alternative to preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) without some of the moral concerns associated with that technology.