Describe the difference between Lincoln’s plan and the plan implemented by the Radical Republicans
Lincoln's plan for Reconstruction was relatively lenient and aimed to quickly reunite the Confederate states with the Union. His plan, known as the 10% plan, required only 10% of a state's population to take an oath of loyalty to the Union in order for the state to be readmitted. Lincoln also promised amnesty to Confederate soldiers and leaders who took an oath of loyalty.
On the other hand, the plan implemented by the Radical Republicans, led by figures like Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner, was much more stringent and aimed to punish the South for their rebellion. The Radical Republicans sought to ensure civil rights for newly freed African Americans and were determined to dismantle the political power of former Confederates. Their plan, known as the Wade-Davis Bill, required a majority of a state's white males to take an oath of loyalty, and it also required states to abolish slavery, before being readmitted to the Union.
Overall, Lincoln's plan was more conciliatory and focused on a quick and peaceful reunification, while the Radical Republicans' plan was more punitive and sought to ensure lasting civil rights for African Americans. Ultimately, the Radical Republicans' plan was implemented after Lincoln's assassination, leading to a period of Reconstruction that was more harsh and contentious.