Are revolutions mire likely to happen in systems that systematically oppress others? Why or why not?
Revolutions are more likely to happen in systems that systematically oppress others because the oppressed group is more likely to reach a breaking point where they can no longer tolerate the injustice and discrimination they face. The feelings of anger, frustration, and resentment can build up over time, leading the oppressed group to seek change through revolution.
Additionally, when a system systematically oppresses a certain group, it can create a sense of solidarity and unity among the oppressed individuals, making it more likely for them to come together and fight against their oppressors. This unified front can make a revolution more likely to succeed.
Furthermore, systems that oppress others often rely on maintaining power imbalances and inequality to continue functioning. As a result, the oppressed group may feel that peaceful means of change are ineffective or insufficient, leading them to resort to revolution as a way to dismantle the oppressive system and create a more just society.
In conclusion, revolutions are more likely to happen in systems that systematically oppress others because of the cumulative effects of oppression, the sense of unity and solidarity it can create among the oppressed, and the perceived necessity of drastic action to bring about change.