In 3-5 sentences, compare the causes and effects of constitutional monarchy in England with the causes and effects of absolute monarchy in Russia. (4 points)
In England, the causes of constitutional monarchy were rooted in the struggle between the monarch and Parliament for power and authority, culminating in the Glorious Revolution of 1688. This led to the establishment of a system where the monarch's powers were limited by a constitution and subject to the approval of Parliament. The effects of constitutional monarchy in England included greater political stability, the development of democratic institutions, and the protection of individual rights.
On the other hand, the causes of absolute monarchy in Russia can be traced back to the autocratic nature of the Russian tsars and the lack of a strong parliamentary system to check their power. This led to the concentration of power in the hands of the monarch, who ruled with absolute authority and control over all aspects of government. The effects of absolute monarchy in Russia included widespread oppression, lack of political freedoms, and economic stagnation as the monarchy prioritized its own interests over those of the people.