Analyze why cotton and oil prices dropped in Texas at the beginning of the Great Depression.
(1 point)
Farmers and refinery owners often went against government orders to produce high surpluses to make up for profit losses.
Farmers and refinery owners had to fire Black and Mexican American workers to provide jobs for White
laborers.
O Farmers and refinery owners received no federal relief funding during the Hoover administration.
Farmers and refinery owners were allowed by state and federal governments to produce large amounts of these natural resources to make up for profit losses
The correct answer is:
Farmers and refinery owners often went against government orders to produce high surpluses to make up for profit losses. Farmers and refinery owners were allowed by state and federal governments to produce large amounts of these natural resources to make up for profit losses.
During the Great Depression, there was a surplus of cotton and oil in Texas. This surplus was primarily caused by the actions of farmers and refinery owners, who went against government orders to produce high surpluses in an attempt to make up for their profit losses. The state and federal governments, hoping to stimulate the economy, allowed and even encouraged the production of large amounts of these natural resources.
However, the increased production only worsened the problem. The excess supply of cotton and oil decreased their prices significantly. The prices dropped to such low levels that it became unprofitable for farmers and refinery owners to continue producing. This further deepened the economic crisis in Texas, as the two major commodities in the state were severely devalued.
Therefore, the drop in cotton and oil prices in Texas at the beginning of the Great Depression can be attributed to the actions of farmers and refinery owners who produced high surpluses, contrary to government orders, in an attempt to compensate for their profit losses.
How did President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal policies in fighting the Great Depression differ from the earlier policies supported by President Hoover? (1 point)
• New Deal policies paid farmers to produce more crops and livestock to make up for earlier losses.
New Deal policies withdrew financial support provided by the federal government and led to higher unemployment.
New Deal policies led to greater involvement by the federal government in providing direct assistance to
• those in need.
New Deal policies depended more on donations and support from private charities and local governments to assist the needy
The correct answer is:
New Deal policies led to greater involvement by the federal government in providing direct assistance to those in need.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal policies, implemented in response to the Great Depression, marked a significant departure from the earlier policies supported by President Hoover. While President Hoover believed in a more hands-off approach, focusing on voluntary efforts and limited government intervention, President Roosevelt's New Deal brought about a fundamental shift in the role of the federal government.
Under the New Deal, the federal government actively intervened in the economy and implemented a series of programs and reforms aimed at stimulating economic recovery and providing relief to those in need. The government provided direct assistance to individuals and families through programs like the Social Security Act, which established unemployment benefits and retirement pensions, as well as the Works Progress Administration, which created jobs for the unemployed.
In contrast, Hoover's policies were more reliant on voluntary measures, private charities, and local governments to assist those affected by the Depression. The belief was that the economy would recover naturally, and government intervention should be limited.
Therefore, the key difference between President Roosevelt's New Deal policies and the earlier policies supported by President Hoover was that the New Deal led to a greater involvement by the federal government in providing direct assistance to those in need, while Hoover's policies relied more on voluntary efforts and limited government intervention.
Which of these statements best explains a New Deal policy that Governor Miriam A. Ferguson successfully used to help Texans overcome the Great Depression? (1 point)
• She passed a state income tax to bring additional money to support Texans.
• She pardoned large numbers of criminals to cut down on prison expenses.
C She fired all 44 Texas Rangers to reduce state expenses.
© She ordered Texas banks to close for a week to prevent people from withdrawing their money.
The correct answer is:
She passed a state income tax to bring additional money to support Texans.
Governor Miriam A. Ferguson successfully used a New Deal policy to help Texans overcome the Great Depression by passing a state income tax. By implementing this income tax, she aimed to bring additional money to support Texans during the economic crisis. The income tax would have provided a source of revenue for the state government, which could then be used for various relief programs and initiatives to alleviate the hardships faced by Texans.
What was one feature that rabbit hunts and FSA migrant work camps shared in helping Texans overcome the Great Depression? (1 point)
They both helped farmers reduce crop damage from wind erosion.
• They both provided a stronger sense of community for people going through difficult times.
• They both rewarded farm workers with financial benefits from New Deal programs.
• They both helped farmers earn money to prevent foreclosures on their homes and property.
The correct answer is:
They both provided a stronger sense of community for people going through difficult times.
Both rabbit hunts and FSA migrant work camps during the Great Depression shared the feature of providing a stronger sense of community for people facing economic hardships. Rabbit hunts were community events where individuals would come together to hunt rabbits, which could be a source of food for struggling families. These hunts not only provided additional sustenance but also fostered a sense of camaraderie and support as neighbors worked together towards a common goal.
Similarly, FSA migrant work camps were established by the federal government under the New Deal to provide housing and employment for displaced farmworkers and their families. These camps were communal living spaces where people faced with unemployment and poverty could come together, live, and work collectively. In these camps, individuals found a supportive environment and a sense of community during a challenging period of their lives.
While both activities may have provided some economic benefits and helped farmers and workers in different ways, the primary feature they shared in helping Texans overcome the Great Depression was providing a stronger sense of community and solidarity during difficult times.
Which of the following statements best analyzes a controversy that arose through the redistricting process in the early 2000s? (1 point)
O Underrepresented populations' voting power was limited to a few minority-majority districts.
O Democrats have gained a majority in more Texas political districts.
O Republicans lost their majority in most Texas political districts.
• Laws targeting voter fraud have increased the electoral power of underrepresented groups.
The correct answer is:
Underrepresented populations' voting power was limited to a few minority-majority districts.
During the redistricting process in the early 2000s, a controversy arose regarding the limitation of voting power for underrepresented populations. This controversy centered around the practice of creating a few minority-majority districts, where the majority of the population was of a particular racial or ethnic minority. While these districts aimed to increase representation for marginalized communities, they also resulted in the concentration of voting power within these limited districts.
By concentrating the voting power of underrepresented populations within a few districts, their influence in other districts was diminished. This raised concerns about gerrymandering and racial segregation, as it restricted the ability of underrepresented populations to have an equal and meaningful impact on the overall electoral process. Critics argued that this approach to redistricting perpetuated inequalities and limited the political influence of these communities beyond a few select districts.
Therefore, the controversy that arose through the redistricting process in the early 2000s was primarily centered around underrepresented populations' voting power being limited to a few minority-majority districts.