Why was the Mexican Cession a significant event? (1 point) Responses It united different cultural groups living in western areas. It united different cultural groups living in western areas. It intensified the debate over the expansion of slavery. It intensified the debate over the expansion of slavery. It created a temporary southern border. It created a temporary southern border. It led to the development of canal systems to move goods
It intensified the debate over the expansion of slavery.
you sure bruh
Yes, I am certain. The Mexican Cession, which occurred as a result of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, added a vast amount of territory to the United States, including present-day California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and parts of Colorado and Wyoming. This territory raised significant questions about the expansion of slavery, as it provided an opportunity for both pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions to push for their respective interests. The debates over whether these newly acquired territories would allow or prohibit slavery eventually led to the Compromise of 1850 and further increased tensions between the North and the South, playing a significant role in the lead-up to the American Civil War.
How did John Calhoun react to the Tariff of 1828? (1 point) Responses He used his power as vice president to influence President Jackson to oppose the tariff. He used his power as vice president to influence President Jackson to oppose the tariff. He led a charge to impose stricter regulations on the Second Bank of the United States. He led a charge to impose stricter regulations on the Second Bank of the United States. He devised a Force Bill allowing the president the right to use the army to enforce the tariff. He devised a Force Bill allowing the president the right to use the army to enforce the tariff. He claimed that states had the right to cancel any federal law deemed unconstitutional. He claimed that states had the right to cancel any federal law deemed unconstitutional. Question 14 #14
He claimed that states had the right to cancel any federal law deemed unconstitutional.
