What is a reason that the Missouri comprise did not have lasting effects
One reason why the Missouri Compromise did not have lasting effects is that it only temporarily addressed the issue of slavery expansion, rather than providing a long-term solution. The compromise aimed to maintain the balance of power between slave and free states by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Additionally, it established the 36°30' parallel as the dividing line between future slave and free states in the Louisiana Purchase territory.
However, as time passed and new territories were acquired, the question of slavery expansion resurfaced. The Compromise was unable to prevent conflicts in subsequent years, such as the Mexican-American War and the acquisition of new territories from Mexico. These events further fueled debates and tensions surrounding the expansion of slavery, leading to the eventual dissolution of the compromise and the eruption of the Civil War.
Furthermore, the Compromise did not address the fundamental moral and political issues surrounding slavery. It did not provide a clear plan for the gradual abolition of slavery or address the rights and treatment of enslaved individuals. This failure to address the core issues surrounding slavery ultimately contributed to the divide between the northern and southern states and hindered any lasting resolution.
In conclusion, the Missouri Compromise's inability to provide a long-term solution to the expansion of slavery, its failure to address core moral and political issues surrounding slavery, and the subsequent conflicts and disagreements it failed to prevent all contributed to why it did not have lasting effects.