In 3–5 sentences, compare the causes and effects of constitutional monarchy in England with the causes and effects of absolute monarchy in Russia
please make it shorter
The causes of constitutional monarchy in England were rooted in the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The English monarchy was forced to share power with Parliament due to the perceived abuse of power by the monarch. The effects were the development of a constitutional framework, with the monarch reigning but not ruling, and the establishment of individual rights and liberties that were enshrined in the Bill of Rights.
In contrast, the causes of absolute monarchy in Russia can be traced to the consolidation of power by Ivan the Terrible and the subsequent reign of Peter the Great. The effects were the concentration of power in the hands of the monarch, with no checks and balances, resulting in limited individual freedoms and the suppression of political dissent. The absolute monarchy in Russia also hindered social and economic progress, as the autocratic rule stifled innovation and reform.
Overall, the causes and effects of constitutional monarchy in England and absolute monarchy in Russia reflected different trajectories in the development of political systems. The English experience led to greater shared power, individual rights, and political stability, while the Russian experience resulted in an autocratic regime that hindered social progress and political reform.