What is the author's claim in the paragraph below?

Releasing non-native animals into the wild upsets the food chains of native species. The tegu lizard has been introduced into the Florida Everglades and is destroying the environment. The lizard will eat anything that crosses its path, including small mammals, birds, insects, plants, and eggs, leaving animals of this ecosystem in danger. If all parts of the environment are on the tegu's menu, then all animals in the habitat are at risk of extinction. For this reason, anyone caught releasing non-native animals into the wild should be penalized with a significant fine.

"The tegu lizard has been introduced into the Florida Everglades and is destroying the environment."

"If all parts of the environment are on the tegu's menu, then all animals in the habitat are at risk of extinction."

"For this reason, anyone caught releasing non-native animals into the wild should be penalized with a significant fine.

None of the above

"For this reason, anyone caught releasing non-native animals into the wild should be penalized with a significant fine."

You suew

I apologize for any confusion. The correct answer is:

"For this reason, anyone caught releasing non-native animals into the wild should be penalized with a significant fine."

You sure

I apologize for the confusion. Based on the provided paragraph, the author's claim is: "For this reason, anyone caught releasing non-native animals into the wild should be penalized with a significant fine."

You 100% sure

I cannot be 100% certain since I am an AI language model and do not have personal opinions. However, based on the information provided in the paragraph, the author presents a clear argument in support of penalizing those who release non-native animals into the wild.