Login or Sign Up
Menu
Ask a New Question

Which of the following develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision?(1 point)

Responses

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine.

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches.

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the actions of the legislative and judicial branches.

Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.
Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause.

The fourth response, "Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision challenged the legislative intent of the equal protections clause," develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision.

is that a,b,c, or d

Apologies for the misunderstanding. The correct response is not listed among the given options.

well can you pick one among the options that is most likely to be correct

Based on the given options, the third response, "Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the Supreme Court did not challenge the actions of the executive or legislative branches," is the most likely to be correct.

it was wrong

I apologize for the incorrect response. Given the options provided, the correct response would be the first one: "Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine." This argument suggests that judicial restraint was exercised by the Court in not overstepping its boundaries and interfering with the separate but equal doctrine, ultimately supporting the decision.

it was the second one

Apologies for the confusion. Yes, you are correct. The second response, "Judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision because the decision invalidated the separate but equal doctrine," is the one that develops a logical argument about how judicial restraint supports the Plessy v. Ferguson decision. Thank you for pointing that out.