An interpreted programming language:
is normally harder for novices to learn.
requires an executable file.
can have a long compile time.
is executed line by line.
An interpreted programming language, in contrast to a compiled language, is executed line by line rather than being compiled into an executable file. This means that the interpreter reads and executes the code directly without the need for a separate compilation step.
While interpreted languages offer advantages like flexibility and ease of debugging, they can also present challenges, particularly for novices. Since they are executed line by line, interpreted languages may result in slower performance compared to compiled languages. Additionally, beginners might find it more difficult to understand the flow and structure of the program as it is executed incrementally.
Furthermore, interpreted languages often require an interpreter program to be installed on the user's system in order to run the code. This dependency on the interpreter can make it harder to distribute and share programs, as users need to install the interpreter before the code can be executed. In contrast, compiled languages produce standalone executable files that can be run independently on compatible systems, without requiring any additional software.
Lastly, interpreted languages can have a longer "compile time" in the sense that there is a delay while the interpreter processes each line of code. This delay can accumulate over time, resulting in slower execution compared to compiled languages that have already undergone the compilation process before execution.
Overall, while interpreted languages offer flexibility and often have simpler syntax, they may present challenges for beginners, require an interpreter, and have potentially slower execution times.