What is a reason Dutch museums may push back against the terminology of the “Dutch Golden Age”?
Dutch museums may push back against the terminology of the "Dutch Golden Age" for several reasons:
1. Colonial Legacy: The term "Dutch Golden Age" typically refers to the 17th century when the Dutch Republic experienced tremendous economic, scientific, and cultural success. However, during this period, the Dutch also had extensive colonial holdings and were involved in the transatlantic slave trade. Many argue that the term "Golden Age" glosses over this dark aspect of Dutch history, and using it can perpetuate a positive and glorified view of the past that ignores the suffering and exploitation of others.
2. Limited Perspective: Critics of the term argue that it focuses too narrowly on the achievements of the wealthy elite and fails to acknowledge the experiences of marginalized groups such as women, non-European immigrants, and lower-class citizens. The term can thus be seen as exclusionary and not representative of the diverse realities of the time.
3. Revisionist History: Some museums object to the term "Golden Age" because they believe historical narratives should be constantly questioned and revised. They argue that using this label implies a fixed and unchanging understanding of the period, hindering a more nuanced exploration of its complexities and contradictions.
4. Representation and Inclusion: Museums are increasingly aware of the need to challenge traditional narratives and make their exhibitions more inclusive. Not using the term "Dutch Golden Age" is seen as a way to move away from a Eurocentric perspective and allow for a broader representation of voices and stories in Dutch history.
Overall, the pushback against the terminology of the "Dutch Golden Age" reflects a desire for more critical and inclusive narratives that acknowledge the complexities of the past and avoid glorifying a period at the expense of marginalized groups.