19.)As the threat of global terrorism becomes an increasing concern, the movement of people
becomes the subject of public policy debate.
A
Why might some individuals concerned about global terrorism advocate the free
movement of people and relatively open immigration policy? This response should
be 2-3 sentences in length.
B. Why might some individuals concerned about global terrorism advocate limits on
the movement of people and relatively restricted immigration policy? This response
should be 2-3 sentences in length.
In 1-2 sentences, explain which of these positions do you find more persuasive, and
A. Some individuals concerned about global terrorism might advocate the free movement of people and relatively open immigration policy because they believe that allowing people from different backgrounds and cultures to interact can promote understanding and reduce the chances of radicalization and terrorism. Additionally, they may argue that strict immigration policies can create a sense of exclusion and further fuel resentment and radicalism.
B. Conversely, some individuals concerned about global terrorism might advocate limits on the movement of people and relatively restricted immigration policy because they believe that it is necessary to prioritize national security and prevent potential terrorists from entering the country. They may argue that strict immigration policies can help in screening and vetting individuals to ensure they do not pose a threat.
I find the first position, advocating the free movement of people and relatively open immigration policy, more persuasive. Promoting understanding and inclusivity through interaction can help address root causes of terrorism and reduce the chances of radicalization. Additionally, strict immigration policies may create a sense of exclusion and marginalization, which can further fuel resentment and extremism.