Analyze the impact of NAFTA on Mexican corn farmers. Why did so many Mexican corn farmers lose their livelihoods as a consequence of NAFTA?(1 point) Responses Mexican farmers could not compete with government-subsidized U.S. corn. Mexican farmers could not compete with government-subsidized U.S. corn. Manufacturing jobs that processed the corn left Mexico for the U.S. due to lower wages, reducing the need for Mexican-grown corn. Manufacturing jobs that processed the corn left Mexico for the U.S. due to lower wages, reducing the need for Mexican-grown corn. NAFTA gave subsidies to Mexican corn farmers to increase production, which flooded the market. NAFTA gave subsidies to Mexican corn farmers to increase production, which flooded the market. Changes in consumer food preferences from corn toward wheat reduced demand.

Question

Analyze the impact of NAFTA on Mexican corn farmers. Why did so many Mexican corn farmers lose their livelihoods as a consequence of NAFTA?(1 point) Responses Mexican farmers could not compete with government-subsidized U.S. corn. Mexican farmers could not compete with government-subsidized U.S. corn. Manufacturing jobs that processed the corn left Mexico for the U.S. due to lower wages, reducing the need for Mexican-grown corn. Manufacturing jobs that processed the corn left Mexico for the U.S. due to lower wages, reducing the need for Mexican-grown corn. NAFTA gave subsidies to Mexican corn farmers to increase production, which flooded the market. NAFTA gave subsidies to Mexican corn farmers to increase production, which flooded the market. Changes in consumer food preferences from corn toward wheat reduced demand.

Answer 1

Mexican corn farmers lost their livelihoods as a consequence of NAFTA primarily due to two main reasons:

1) Competition with U.S. subsidized corn: NAFTA allowed for the free trade of agricultural products between Mexico and the United States. However, while the U.S. government heavily subsidized corn production, Mexican corn farmers lacked similar support. As a result, Mexican farmers could not compete with cheaper U.S. corn flooding the Mexican market, leading to a decline in demand for Mexican-grown corn.

2) Loss of manufacturing jobs: The implementation of NAFTA led to a significant shift in manufacturing jobs related to corn processing from Mexico to the United States. This was mainly due to lower wages in the United States, which made it more cost-effective for companies to relocate their corn processing facilities. With the decline in manufacturing jobs in Mexico, the demand for Mexican-grown corn also decreased.

Additionally, there was a suggestion in the response that the market was flooded with corn due to subsidies given to Mexican corn farmers to increase production. This flooding of the market further exacerbated the situation for Mexican farmers, as it led to a surplus of corn supply and subsequently reduced prices.

Lastly, changes in consumer food preferences also played a role in the loss of livelihoods for Mexican corn farmers. As consumer preferences shifted from corn toward wheat, the demand for Mexican-grown corn decreased. This shift in preference could be attributed to various factors such as changing diets or the introduction of new food products.

Overall, the combination of U.S. subsidized corn, the loss of manufacturing jobs, a flooded market, and changes in consumer food preferences contributed to the significant impact NAFTA had on Mexican corn farmers, resulting in many of them losing their livelihoods.