Write a paragraph in which you explain why it matters when the two authors; “say no to genetically engineered salmon” by Rick moonen and “genetically modified salmon can feed the world” by yonathan zohar, interpret the same facts differently. Using specific examples from the two texts, describe the impact of the authors’ differing interpretations of the facts on you as a reader
When two authors interpret the same facts differently, it matters because it allows readers to gain a more well-rounded perspective on the topic at hand. In the case of Rick Moonen's article "Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon" and Yonathan Zohar's piece "Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World," their divergent interpretations of the facts surrounding genetically engineered salmon offer contrasting viewpoints. For instance, Moonen highlights the potential environmental risks and unknown long-term effects of genetically modified fish on ecosystems. In contrast, Zohar emphasizes the potential benefits of genetically modified salmon, such as addressing global food shortages. As a reader, the impact of these differing interpretations prompts critical thinking and evaluation of both arguments, enabling me to form an informed opinion.
