(a) Contrast How does a Sherpa’s income per season contrast with the median income per year? (b) Speculate Why do you think this contrast exists?
(a) A Sherpa's income per season contrasts significantly with the median income per year. Sherpas in Nepal typically earn an average of $3,000 to $5,000 per climbing season, which lasts for around two to three months. On the other hand, the median income per year in Nepal is approximately $1,100.
(b) There are several reasons for this stark contrast. Firstly, the work of a Sherpa is physically demanding, risky, and requires specialized skills and expertise in high-altitude mountaineering. Consequently, the demand for Sherpas is limited compared to other professions that contribute to the overall economy. Additionally, the limited climbing season and weather constraints further restrict the earning potential of Sherpas.
Furthermore, the labor market for Sherpas is highly competitive, as many individuals from Sherpa communities aspire to work in the climbing industry due to the relatively high earning potential it offers compared to other local employment opportunities. This competition drives down wages as there is a surplus of available Sherpas.
Another factor is the bargaining power and negotiating position of Sherpas. Since most Sherpas work as part of a larger expedition team, they typically rely on climbing agencies or expedition leaders to secure employment. This power imbalance may result in Sherpas accepting lower wages due to the lack of alternatives or fear of losing out on potential work opportunities.
Finally, socioeconomic factors, such as limited access to education and economic opportunities in Sherpa communities, may contribute to the disparity in income levels. The median income in Nepal as a whole is impacted by various industries and sectors, whereas the Sherpa community's income is predominantly derived from climbing expeditions.
In conclusion, the contrast in income between Sherpas per season and the median income per year is primarily influenced by the specialization and risks associated with high-altitude mountaineering, limited climbing seasons, competition, power dynamics, and socioeconomic factors.