Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment.

Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. 

On which fact do the two sources disagree? 

(1 point)
Responses

There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.
There is a need to protect the environment with recycling.

Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.
Recycling programs in schools damage the environment.

Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.
Successful recycling programs require the participation of many people.

There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
There are too many people in a school district to follow one plan.
Skip to navigation

The two sources disagree on the effectiveness of requiring school districts to recycle. Source 1 argues that school districts' participation is necessary for recycling to have an impact on the environment, while Source 2 suggests that getting all students to follow a specific recycling program can be difficult and may cause programs to be ineffective.