The Supreme Court case of Weeks v. United States deals with the issue of search and seizure. The Court found that Mr. Weeek's
Response area rights were violated because police did not obtain a search warrant or have probable cause before they entered his home.
Actually, your statement is partially correct. The Supreme Court case of Weeks v. United States did deal with the issue of search and seizure, but it did not involve the entry into Mr. Weeks' home.
In Weeks v. United States, the Court held that the warrantless seizure of items from a private residence by federal agents violated the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Court established the "exclusionary rule," which states that evidence obtained through an unlawful search or seizure cannot be used in a federal criminal trial.
The case itself involved the warrantless seizure of papers and other items from Weeks' office by federal agents, who were investigating him for illegal gambling. The Supreme Court's decision in Weeks v. United States was a significant step in ensuring the protection of individuals' constitutional rights against unreasonable search and seizure, and it laid the foundation for the exclusionary rule to be applied in future cases.