A researcher examines genes for several proteins that are quite similar in both structure and function. He is interested in determining whether the genes form a multigene family and in working out which of the proteins arose first evolutionarily. What would be the BEST approach to take to address this question? Be careful to look for the best approach; some other approaches could also provide useful information while being less definitive.

(1 point)

The researcher should sequence the genes and compare their sequences. The most similar genes are likely the most closely related, while those that have more base differences probably diverged earlier.

The researcher should examine the functions of the proteins. Those with the most similar functions are the most closely related

The researcher should induce mutations in the genes to see how these affect the function. The most mutations needed to cause changes in the function of the protein, the older the gene.

The researcher should examine the functions of the proteins: Whichever protein has the most critical function is probably the oldest protein.

The best approach would be for the researcher to sequence the genes and compare their sequences. By comparing the sequences, the researcher can identify the most similar genes, indicating that they are more closely related. On the other hand, genes with more base differences would have diverged earlier in evolution. This approach provides direct genetic evidence of evolutionary relationships and is therefore the most definitive in determining which protein arose first evolutionarily.