Claim 1

What do you think about when you toss a plastic bag into the garbage? If you’re like most people, then you probably do not think about much at all. We don’t think about the fact that plastic bags take centuries to decay. We do not think about how many bags end up in lakes, rivers, and oceans, harming wildlife and even causing death. However, we should think about all this. Better yet, we should do something about it: ban the use of plastic bags. If this happens, then we will all feel better knowing that we are not contributing to pollution and harming wildlife. And besides, plastic bags are not a necessity. Paper bags are an alternative, and so are reusable cloth bags.
Claim 2
It seems like we are drowning in plastic bags, but before you decide to ban them, you should remember some of the reasons companies started using plastic back in the 1970s. Before there was plastic, there was paper and cardboard, which are made from trees. So, switching from paper to plastic saved some trees. Plastic also saved people money because it kept food fresher for longer. Also, it is lighter than cardboard or glass, so it was cheaper to ship things wrapped in plastic. Plus, plastic is safer than glass, which tends to break. So, yes, we should be using less plastic, but it does not make sense to ban it until we find a better solution.

Which paragraph provides more sound arguments? Why or why not? Write 3-4 sentences supporting your answer.

Paragraph 1 provides more sound arguments. This is because it raises valid concerns about the environmental impact of plastic bags, such as their slow decay time and the harm they can cause to wildlife and ecosystems. It also suggests practical alternatives, such as paper bags and reusable cloth bags. In contrast, paragraph 2 focuses more on the historical reasons for using plastic bags and fails to address the negative consequences associated with their usage.