Use the paragraph to answer the question.
Releasing non-native animals into the wild upsets the food chains of native species. The tegu lizard has been introduced into the Florida Everglades and is destroying the environment. The LIZZARD will eat anything that crosses its path, including small mammals, birds, insects, plants, and eggs, leaving animals of this ecosystem in danger. If all parts of the evidonment are on the tegus menu, then all animals in the habitat are at risk of extinction. For this reason, anyone caught releasing non-native animals into the wild should be penalized with a significant fine.
How does the author support the claim that people who realize non-native animals into the wild should be punished?
Options:
By including the author support the claim that people who release non-native animals into the wild should be punished?
By including evidence that shows that animals are more likely to thrive in their native environment
By including data that shows that the threat of punishment stops people from releasing non/native animals into the wild
By including reasons that people might be tempted to take an animal out of its native environment
The author supports the claim that people who release non-native animals into the wild should be punished by including evidence that shows the negative impact of these animals on the environment. The paragraph mentions how the tegu lizard, which is a non-native species, is destroying the ecosystem by eating small mammals, birds, insects, plants, and eggs, which puts the animals in this habitat at risk of extinction. This evidence shows the harm that releasing non-native animals can cause and justifies the need for punishment.
Pick the correct answer out of my options
The correct answer is:
By including evidence that shows that animals are more likely to thrive in their native environment