"Claim: Bird feeders are a kind way to help the birds in the community.
Opposing claim: Bird feeders make it easy for outdoor cats to prey on birds."
Which statement is a good counterargument to the opposing claim?
(1 point)
Responses
Most cat owners keep their pets inside.
Most cat owners keep their pets inside.
Most cats chase squirrels instead of birds.
Most cats chase squirrels instead of birds.
Bird feeders that hang from trees protect birds from predators.
Bird feeders that hang from trees protect birds from predators.
Birds don't feed when cats are around.
Bird feeders that hang from trees protect birds from predators.
The best way for an author to address an opposing claim is by providing a counterargument to address it. By presenting a well-reasoned counterargument, the author can acknowledge the opposing viewpoint and provide evidence or logical reasoning to refute it. This approach demonstrates a thorough understanding of the subject matter and shows that the author has considered alternative perspectives. Ignoring the opposing claim may weaken the author's credibility and diminish the overall effectiveness of their argument. Including evidence that supports the opposing claim can be a valid approach in some cases, as it shows that the author has considered different viewpoints and is willing to acknowledge valid arguments. However, it is generally more effective to address the opposing claim directly and explain why it is false, utilizing evidence or logical reasoning to support the author's position.
