Chief Justice John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court ruled in Worcester v. Georgia that the Cherokee were a sovereign nation. Despite this ruling (1 point)
, the state of Georgia and President Andrew Jackson refused to enforce it. They continued with their efforts to remove the Cherokee from their lands, leading to the infamous Trail of Tears, in which thousands of Cherokee people died as they were forcibly relocated to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma).
To identify the claim, ask, _______________What is the author's main position or assertion?______________________
__________________________________________________________.
To identify the reasons, ask, _______________What arguments or justifications does the author provide to support the claim?____________________
___________________________________________________________.
To identify the evidence, ask, _____________What specific facts, examples, or data does the author present to support each reason?_____________________
___________________________________________________________.
To identify the claim, ask, "What is the author's main position or assertion?"
The claim: Despite the ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, the state of Georgia and President Andrew Jackson refused to enforce it.
To identify the reasons, ask, "What arguments or justifications does the author provide to support the claim?"
The reasons:
1. The state of Georgia and President Andrew Jackson continued with their efforts to remove the Cherokee from their lands.
To identify the evidence, ask, "What specific facts, examples, or data does the author present to support each reason?"
The evidence:
- Thousands of Cherokee people died during the Trail of Tears, which was the result of their forcible relocation to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma).
the Cherokee could not hold political offices in Georgia. The Cherokee could not hold political offices in Georgia. The Indian Removal Act could not be enforced.The Indian Removal Act could not be enforced.The Cherokee were still forced to leave their lands in Georgia.The Cherokee were still forced to leave their lands in Georgia.The Indian Removal Act was still repealed.
To identify the claim, ask, "What is the author's main position or assertion?"
The claim: Despite the ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, the Cherokee were still not able to hold political offices in Georgia, the Indian Removal Act could not be enforced, the Cherokee were still forced to leave their lands in Georgia, and the Indian Removal Act was still repealed.
To identify the reasons, ask, "What arguments or justifications does the author provide to support the claim?"
The reasons:
1. The Cherokee were not able to hold political offices in Georgia.
2. The Indian Removal Act could not be enforced.
3. The Cherokee were still forced to leave their lands in Georgia.
4. The Indian Removal Act was still repealed.
To identify the evidence, ask, "What specific facts, examples, or data does the author present to support each reason?"
The evidence:
- No specific evidence is provided for the claim that the Cherokee could not hold political offices in Georgia.
- No specific evidence is provided for the claim that the Indian Removal Act could not be enforced.
- The fact that the Cherokee were still forced to leave their lands in Georgia serves as evidence.
- The claim that the Indian Removal Act was still repealed requires more specific evidence to support it.
no fill in the blanks
To identify the claim, ask, "What is the author's main position or assertion?"
The claim: Despite the ruling in Worcester v. Georgia, the Cherokee were still not able to hold political offices in Georgia, the Indian Removal Act could not be enforced, the Cherokee were still forced to leave their lands in Georgia, and the Indian Removal Act was still repealed.
To identify the reasons, ask, "What arguments or justifications does the author provide to support the claim?"
The reasons:
1. The Cherokee could not hold political offices in Georgia.
2. The Indian Removal Act could not be enforced.
3. The Cherokee were still forced to leave their lands in Georgia.
4. The Indian Removal Act was still repealed.
To identify the evidence, ask, "What specific facts, examples, or data does the author present to support each reason?"
The evidence:
1. The fact that the Cherokee were unable to hold political offices in Georgia.
2. The fact that the Indian Removal Act could not be enforced.
3. The fact that the Cherokee were forced to leave their lands in Georgia.
4. The claim that the Indian Removal Act was repealed requires more specific evidence to support it.
To identify the claim, ask, _______________What is the author's main position or assertion?______________________
__________________________________________________________.
To identify the reasons, ask, _______________What arguments or justifications does the author provide to support the claim?____________________
___________________________________________________________.
To identify the evidence, ask, _____________What specific facts, examples, or data does the author present to support each reason?_____________________
___________________________________________________________.
fill in the blanks
To identify the claim, ask, "What is the author's main position or assertion?"
The claim: [Provide the main position or assertion of the author]
To identify the reasons, ask, "What arguments or justifications does the author provide to support the claim?"
The reasons: [List the arguments or justifications provided by the author to support the claim]
To identify the evidence, ask, "What specific facts, examples, or data does the author present to support each reason?"
The evidence: [Specify the specific facts, examples, or data presented by the author to support each reason]