When deciding how to organize a persuasive text, which should come first in the text?(1 point)
Responses
an opposing claim
an opposing claim
the most important arguments
the most important arguments
a call to action
a call to action
the most interesting information
the most interesting information
When organizing a persuasive text, different structures can be effective depending on the context and the specific goals of the writer. However, a common and often effective structure involves presenting the most important arguments first. This approach ensures that the reader encounters the strongest points right away, which can help to establish a solid foundation for the persuasive message and engage the reader's interest and understanding of the stakes involved.
So, out of the options provided:
- An opposing claim is often addressed later in the text, after the writer has established their own arguments. This allows the writer to refute the opposition having already built a strong case for their own position.
- A call to action typically comes towards the end of the persuasive text, after the writer has laid out all of their arguments and wants to motivate the reader to take a specific step or adopt a particular viewpoint.
- The most interesting information may be subjective and could indeed be one of the most important arguments if it is compelling and persuasive. However, it might not necessarily be the same thing as the most important arguments overall.
Therefore, the best choice among the given options, in a general sense, would be:
**the most important arguments**