Which would be a sound argument for the proposition that a community should sponsor a riverfront clean-up day?(1 point)
Responses
The Ohio River is nearly 1,000 miles long from end to end, and that's more than one-third of the length of the Mississippi River.
The Ohio River is nearly 1,000 miles long from end to end, and that's more than one-third of the length of the Mississippi River.
A clean-up day would bring the community together on a project to reduce pollution and beautify the parks.
A clean-up day would bring the community together on a project to reduce pollution and beautify the parks.
Students need more community service hours for graduation, and a clean-up day is a fun option.
Students need more community service hours for graduation, and a clean-up day is a fun option.
Many people in our community enjoy walking by the riverfront.
To argue in favor of sponsoring a riverfront clean-up day, the argument should focus on the benefits that such an activity would bring to the community and the environment. Among the four options provided, the statement that presents the most coherent rationale for a clean-up day is:
"A clean-up day would bring the community together on a project to reduce pollution and beautify the parks."
This argument is sound because it directly addresses the purpose of the clean-up (to reduce pollution and beautify the area), while also highlighting the community-building aspect of the activity. It suggests tangible benefits that are likely to appeal to the community, including improved environmental conditions and enhanced recreational spaces, thereby implying that the action aligns with the community's interests and values.
The first option, mentioning the length of the Ohio River in comparison with the Mississippi River, is an interesting fact but does not offer a direct argument for sponsoring a clean-up day. The third option, regarding student community service hours, is also supportive but is a narrower justification as it focuses mainly on the benefit to students rather than the community as a whole. The last option mentions that people enjoy walking by the riverfront, which could imply a cleaner riverfront would improve their experience, but as stated, it lacks emphasis on the collective action and positive outcomes of a clean-up initiative.