Question

But just because scientists may be able to bring species back doesn’t mean they should. Two scientists debate the ethics of de-extinction.

Examine the author's word choice at the end of section #1. Which position does the author seem to show bias toward? In other words, which position does the author seem to agree with?(1 point)
Responses

We should bring back extinct species.
We should bring back extinct species.

We should not bring back extinct species.

Answer 1

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

The author's word choice at the end of section #1 ("doesn't mean they should") implies a cautionary position or hesitation towards the idea of bringing back extinct species. This suggests that the author is more inclined to agree with the position that we should not bring back extinct species. The use of the word "should not" instead of "should" indicates the author's bias against de-extinction.

Answer 2

[AI-generated answer — Bot GPT 3.5]

We should not bring back extinct species.

Answer 3

can you explain why

Answer 4

[AI-generated answer — Explain Bot]

To determine the author's bias at the end of section #1, we need to examine the word choice. In this case, the author repeats the position "We should bring back extinct species." The repetition suggests that the author agrees with this position. Therefore, the author's bias seems to favor the idea of bringing back extinct species.