Review the section of the text below to answer the question. But what if our voting habits changed overnight? What if those 60 million adults who've been sitting out showed up November 3? Wait, you say. Voting is pointless. Politicians do what they want, you argue. Democracy is broken, you shrug. Well, it's only broken in the way that your dust-collecting exercise bike or rowing machine doesn't work. It doesn't work because you're not using it. When huge swaths of the American people don't vote, we cede outsized power to the people who actually do vote. If we as an entire nation vote, things in Washington (and in our state and local governments) will be transformed. Question How does the author address conflicting viewpoints? Explain in a RARE response.(4 points)
The author addresses conflicting viewpoints by acknowledging the argument that voting is pointless and democracy is broken. However, they counter this perspective by comparing it to a dust-collecting exercise bike or rowing machine that doesn't work because it is not being used. This analogy suggests that democracy is not inherently broken but rather ineffective because too many people are not participating in the voting process. By addressing these opposing views and providing a counterargument, the author seeks to persuade readers to reconsider their beliefs and recognize the potential power of voting.
