Use the two passages below to answer the question. Passage 1: Making Election Day a national holiday will increase voter turnout by enabling more people to vote. In the 2016 presidential election, 55.7% of the American voting-age population cast a ballot. Among registered voters in the 2016 US presidential election, being “too busy” or having a conflicting schedule was the third-highest reason cited for not voting, accounting for 14% of registered voters who did not cast a vote (about 2.7 million people). A holiday would allow more citizens volunteer at polling places or drive the elderly to vote, and make a difference in states where long lines at the polls keep voters waiting for hours. Passage 2: Making Election Day a national holiday would not make a difference. The people who aren't showing up are just too lazy or uninterested in government to make an effort. Most people who don't vote feel that their vote doesn't count, so why bother? Until we end the corruption in our elected officials, people just aren't going to be motivated to vote. In addition, even if we made Election Day a national holiday, there are still plenty of people who would still have to work (hospital workers, retail and restaurant workers, etc). Question Which passage provides more sound arguments? Explain in a RARE response.(4 points) 0 / 10000 Word Limit Skip to navigation

The first passage provides more sound arguments. In Passage 1, the argument is made that making Election Day a national holiday would increase voter turnout by enabling more people to vote. This argument is supported by evidence from the 2016 presidential election, where it is stated that 55.7% of the American voting-age population cast a ballot. It is further explained that among registered voters, being "too busy" or having a conflicting schedule was the third-highest reason cited for not voting, accounting for 14% of registered voters who did not cast a vote. This data provides a logical basis for the argument that a holiday would allow more citizens to volunteer at polling places, drive the elderly to vote, and help reduce long lines at the polls. These reasons address practical barriers to voting and provide concrete ways in which a national holiday could lead to increased voter participation.

In contrast, Passage 2 dismisses the idea of making Election Day a national holiday as not making a difference. The arguments presented in Passage 2 are unsupported and based on generalizations. The passage suggests that people who do not vote are lazy or uninterested in government, without providing any evidence or data to support this claim. It also asserts that most people who do not vote feel that their vote doesn't count, without explaining where this belief comes from or providing any evidence to support it. Furthermore, the argument that corruption in elected officials discourages people from voting is a broad statement that lacks specific examples or evidence. Lastly, while it is true that there are certain professions that would still require individuals to work on a national holiday, this argument does not invalidate the potential benefits of making Election Day a holiday for a significant portion of the population.

In summary, Passage 1 provides more sound arguments as it uses data from past elections to support the claim that making Election Day a national holiday would increase voter turnout. It addresses practical barriers to voting and provides concrete examples of how a holiday could facilitate citizen participation in the voting process. Passage 2, on the other hand, relies on unsupported generalizations and lacks evidence to back up its claims.