Review the section of the text below to answer the question.

Question

Review the section of the text below to answer the question.

But what if our voting habits changed overnight? What if those 60 million adults who've been sitting out showed up November 3?

Wait, you say. Voting is pointless. Politicians do what they want, you argue. Democracy is broken, you shrug. Well, it's only broken in the way that your dust-collecting exercise bike or rowing machine doesn't work. It doesn't work because you're not using it.

When huge swaths of the American people don't vote, we cede outsized power to the people who actually do vote. If we as an entire nation vote, things in Washington (and in our state and local governments) will be transformed.

Question
How does the author address conflicting viewpoints?
Explain in a RARE response.(4 points)

Answer 1

The author addresses conflicting viewpoints by acknowledging the argument that voting is pointless and that democracy is broken. However, they then counter these arguments by comparing democracy to a dust-collecting exercise bike or rowing machine that doesn't work because it is not being used. By doing so, the author suggests that the reason voting may seem pointless or democracy may seem broken is because large numbers of people are choosing not to participate. The author then presents the idea that if everyone in the nation were to vote, it would lead to a transformation in government. This approach of acknowledging conflicting viewpoints and offering contrasting perspectives helps to persuade the reader to consider the importance of voting.