How would Samuel Worcester most likely viewed the end result of the legal battle between Georgia and Cherokee people?
Samuel Worcester would likely have viewed the end result of the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people as a disappointment and a violation of justice. Worcester was a missionary and a staunch advocate for Native American rights, particularly the Cherokee. He believed that the Cherokees had the right to maintain their sovereignty and autonomy over their land and way of life.
In the case of Worcester v. Georgia (1832), Worcester challenged the Georgia state law that required non-Native Americans to obtain a license to reside on Cherokee lands without taking an oath of allegiance to the state. Despite an earlier ruling by the Supreme Court affirming Cherokee sovereignty in the case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831), the court, under pressure from President Andrew Jackson who refused to enforce the earlier ruling, reversed their decision.
The court's ruling essentially denied the rights and sovereignty of the Cherokee people and allowed Georgia to enforce its oppressive laws on their lands. This decision led to the forced removal of the Cherokee people from their ancestral lands in what became known as the Trail of Tears, resulting in thousands of Cherokee deaths.
Given Worcester's advocacy for Native American rights and his close relationships with the Cherokee people, he would have likely seen the end result of the legal battle as a grave injustice. He would have likely lamented the court's reversal of their earlier decision and the devastating consequences it had for the Cherokee people.