Vertical Cities: Can Mega-Skyscrapers Solve Urban Population Overload?

Vertical cities could be much more than monolithic luxury towers, but the idea has its skeptics.

4 Minute Read

December 2, 2018, 1:00 PM PST

By Kayla Matthews @KaylaEMatthews

twitter
facebook
linkedin
email
email
Share
Shanghai Tower, World Financial Center, and Jin Mao Tower
JaysonPhotography / Shutterstock
The current global population is around 7.6 billion, and experts expect it to grow to 9.8 billion in 2050 and 11.2 billion in 2100. This rapidly expanding population is stressing the earth's natural resources and changing its climate. It brings up questions of how all these people will be able to access adequate food, water, housing, and medical care.

Expanding cities horizontally to make room for all these new people would destroy more natural resources, so a growing number of people are proposing vertical cities as a solution to this dilemma.

Vertical cities take the idea of skyscrapers and expand on it. A vertical city, according to a nonprofit promoting the concept, is an "arrangement of interconnected mega towers" that could support hundreds of thousands of people. These buildings could be as tall as 400 floors and contain housing, stores, hospitals, schools, farms, and outdoor spaces, all in one building or series of connected structures.

Architects would design these towers with sustainability in mind, and could even make them entirely self-sustaining.

The Benefits
What would be the benefits of a vertical city? As populations expand, we need to find ways to house people without destroying what's left of our natural environment.

Building upward instead of outward enables us to host vast amounts of people in a small footprint, while conserving land and natural resources. We could then use the land for food production, recreation or natural resources, or leave it as a natural area.

Vertical cities could also have other environmental benefits. Having numerous services and amenities in these megatowers would reduce the need for driving, reducing emissions associated with cars and saving residents money.

These buildings could also save energy and even generate their own electricity. These towers would have a multitude of surfaces where people could install solar panels, and their height and size makes them ideal for wind turbines. The new Shanghai Tower, one of the world's tallest buildings, has already implemented this idea and has 270 wind turbines built into its facade.

These buildings may also foster social connectedness by making it easier for individuals to socialize in common areas and visit friends. To do so, they would not even have to leave the building, although of course, they could if they wanted to.

The Downsides
Not everyone is enthusiastic about the idea of vertical cities, though. Some feel these buildings would create more problems than they would solve.

One argument is that they would make cities less livable because people would have little reason to leave the towers, reducing the amount of time people spend on the streets of the city. The buildings could also disrupt the skyline and interfere with the feel and culture of historic neighborhoods.

Some worry people might also begin to feel claustrophobic in these towers because they would spend too little time outdoors, which is unhealthy.

One potential remedy to this is integrating outdoor spaces into the towers, such as gardens, pools and other areas on balconies and rooftops. Their design could also let in large amounts of natural light. Additionally, residents could leave anytime and spend time in the natural areas building the towers helped preserve.

Another concern has to do with the safety aspects of these mega-structures. Their architects would have to design these buildings to withstand earthquakes, as a collapse would be disastrous. Fighting fires that might break out in the buildings would also be a challenge, and they would have to incorporate adequate fire escape routes.

Safety would need to be an integral part of every stage of planning and constructing a vertical city. Even things like the temperature outside while pouring concrete would need to come under scrutiny, since pouring it in hot weather can cause cracks and areas of weakness. As a building increases in height, safety concerns magnify, making every little detail that much more important.

Are Vertical Cities Feasible?
Right now, we have some very tall buildings, but nothing nearly as ambitious as a vertical city. Architects have come up with some theoretical designs, though. Italian firm Luca Curci Architects, for example, created an idea for a 180-floor vertical city that could support up to 25,000 people.

The building would be zero-impact, include plenty of green spaces and let in natural light and air. It would be in the water and accessible via boat, helicopter or a semi-submerged bridge.

For now, it is a concept—one that looks increasingly appealing as populations continue to grow and our planet's resources become more stressed.

Building vertical cities would take extensive amounts of research and planning, but they could help solve some of humankind's biggest challenges, so the effort may be worthwhile.

Directions: Use the information in this document as a guide for participating in
discussion assessments.
Discussions are an interactive feature of an online course. In discussions, you can
share conclusions, analyze concepts, and clarify ideas with classmates. You will
have the opportunity to affirm one another’s work and synthesize ideas.
To promote a safe and thoughtful forum for discussion, follow these guidelines
when posting comments.
• Respect diversity. Families and individuals bring with them diverse
backgrounds, faiths, and values. You must strive to respect all of them.
• Keep it clean and safe. Refrain from using any language or posting any
material that could be construed as threatening, profane, or inappropriate.
• Think before you post. It is proper netiquette to avoid using all caps since
it is a form of yelling. Since it is sometimes difficult to distinguish the tone
and intent of an author in electronic communication, think before writing
your response. Ask for clarification if you are unsure of the meaning of a
comment. Do not include external links in any posting.
The rubric on the following page identifies the qualities of an excellent, a
satisfactory, and a poor response. When you respond to your classmates, you are
expected to go beyond “I agree” or “I disagree.” Include facts to support your
answer. You may also question a response and ask for additional clarification,
support, or insight on the topic.
A persuasive response varies in length depending on the question; a paragraph is
appropriate in most cases. If you are writing only one sentence to contribute to the
discussion, you may want to consider your response more carefully. Also keep in
mind that while citing evidence is essential, it’s best to write concisely and avoid
redundancy.

I believe that vertical cities could be a viable solution to urban population overload. As the global population continues to grow, it becomes increasingly difficult to accommodate everyone in traditional horizontal cities without destroying natural resources and expanding into already limited land.

Vertical cities have the potential to house a large number of people in a small footprint, allowing us to conserve land and natural resources. Additionally, they could have numerous environmental benefits, such as reducing the need for driving and saving energy. Implementing sustainable features like solar panels and wind turbines can help generate electricity and reduce emissions.

Furthermore, vertical cities may promote social connectedness by providing common areas for residents to socialize and visit friends within the same building. While some argue that this may reduce the livability of cities and lead to less time spent outdoors, integrating outdoor spaces into the design of these towers, such as gardens and rooftop areas, can address these concerns.

Of course, there are challenges and concerns such as safety issues and preserving the cultural identity of historic neighborhoods. However, with careful planning and design, these challenges can be overcome. Safety should be a priority, and architects would need to ensure that these mega-structures can withstand earthquakes and have adequate fire escape routes.

Although there are currently no vertical cities in existence, the concept has been explored through theoretical designs. With further research and planning, vertical cities could potentially provide a solution to the growing population and resource constraints. Therefore, I believe that the effort to build vertical cities is worthwhile.