choose ONE of the three options below and write a paragraph using the two articles about text speak
Your three options are as follows:
Option One:
Write a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. Explain why it is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information. Provide specific examples from the two texts.
Option Two:
Write a paragraph in which you explain why it matters when the two authors interpret the same facts differently. Using specific examples from the two texts, describe the impact of the authors’ differing interpretations of the facts on you as a reader.
Option Three:
Write a paragraph in which you explain how including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can make it more persuasive. Describe the effect that including point of view and evidence can have on readers. Give specific examples.
Option Three:
Including a conflicting point of view and evidence in an argument can greatly enhance its persuasiveness. By acknowledging and addressing opposing viewpoints, the writer demonstrates a willingness to engage with different perspectives, thereby instilling trust and credibility in the reader. This approach also allows the writer to anticipate counterarguments and preemptively refute them, strengthening their overall argument. In the two texts about text speak, the authors present differing viewpoints on its impact on language and communication. In one article, text speak is presented as a harmful phenomenon that is causing the degradation of language skills. However, in the other article, text speak is portrayed as a natural evolution of communication and a way to enhance efficiency in written conversations. By including these conflicting viewpoints, the authors prompt readers to consider both sides of the argument before forming their own opinions. This inclusivity of differing perspectives makes the argument more robust and persuasive.