Which did Georgia support for the U.S. Constitution? Select the TWO that apply. (2 points)
creating a strong central govemment
creating a weaker central government and giving states most of the power
leaving the Articles of Confederation as is and making no changes to government
replacing the Articles of Confederation altogether
creating a strong central government and replacing the Articles of Confederation altogether
To determine which options Georgia supported for the U.S. Constitution, we can look at the historical context and the beliefs of the state at that time.
During the Constitutional Convention in 1787, Georgia was one of the thirteen original states. When considering its position on the U.S. Constitution, we can eliminate two options:
1. Leaving the Articles of Confederation as is and making no changes to the government: This option is not likely as the Constitutional Convention was called to address the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.
2. Creating a weaker central government and giving states most of the power: This option goes against the intentions of the Constitutional Convention, which aimed to create a stronger central government compared to the decentralized approach under the Articles of Confederation.
Therefore, the two options that apply are:
1. Creating a strong central government: Georgia likely supported the idea of a strong central government since the new Constitution aimed to grant the federal government greater authority and power in relation to the states, addressing the perceived weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.
2. Replacing the Articles of Confederation altogether: Georgia likely supported replacing the Articles of Confederation with a new constitution that would establish a different system of government.
In summary, based on the historical context, Georgia likely supported creating a strong central government and replacing the Articles of Confederation altogether.