Which of the following statements best explains the development of constitutional monarchy in England?(1 point)
Responses
Between Charles I and the Glorious Revolution, English monarchs were in constant conflict with Parliament, eventually leading Parliament to pass the English Bill of Rights to try to keep monarchs from causing more civil wars.
Between Charles I and the Glorious Revolution, English monarchs were in constant conflict with Parliament, eventually leading Parliament to pass the English Bill of Rights to try to keep monarchs from causing more civil wars.
The idea that a monarch’s powers should not be absolute was first made law in the Magna Carta, and with the Glorious Revolution it became the basis of England’s monarchial system.
The idea that a monarch’s powers should not be absolute was first made law in the Magna Carta, and with the Glorious Revolution it became the basis of England’s monarchial system.
The idea that a monarch’s powers were their divine right was destroyed by the Magna Carta, and over time the English monarch became weaker and Parliament became stronger until constitutional monarchy was established.
The idea that a monarch’s powers were their divine right was destroyed by the Magna Carta, and over time the English monarch became weaker and Parliament became stronger until constitutional monarchy was established.
Constitutional monarchy developed because of the Magna Carta, which led to the Glorious Revolution.
The idea that a monarch’s powers should not be absolute was first made law in the Magna Carta, and with the Glorious Revolution it became the basis of England’s monarchial system.
The best statement that explains the development of constitutional monarchy in England is:
The idea that a monarch’s powers should not be absolute was first made law in the Magna Carta, and with the Glorious Revolution it became the basis of England’s monarchial system.
The best answer that explains the development of constitutional monarchy in England is:
Between Charles I and the Glorious Revolution, English monarchs were in constant conflict with Parliament, eventually leading Parliament to pass the English Bill of Rights to try to keep monarchs from causing more civil wars.
To arrive at this answer, we need to understand the historical context. Start by recognizing that the development of constitutional monarchy refers to the shift of power from the monarch to a system that limits their authority.
First, consider the option that mentions the Magna Carta. While the Magna Carta was significant in establishing limited royal authority in 1215, it alone did not lead to the development of constitutional monarchy. It was an early milestone but didn't directly result in the system as we know it today.
Now, focus on the option that mentions the Glorious Revolution. This event occurred in 1688 when William of Orange and his wife Mary overthrew James II. The Glorious Revolution marked a crucial turning point in the development of constitutional monarchy in England.
Next, examine the option that talks about conflict between English monarchs and Parliament. This choice rightly acknowledges that monarchs and Parliament were often at odds during this period. The conflict eventually escalated to a point where Parliament, in response to Charles I's actions and the resulting civil wars, passed the English Bill of Rights in 1689. The bill established key limitations on the powers of the monarchy, such as forbidding the sovereign from suspending laws without Parliament's consent or maintaining a standing army in peacetime without parliamentary approval.
By considering both the Glorious Revolution and the English Bill of Rights, we can conclude that the option mentioning the conflict with Parliament leading to the passage of the English Bill of Rights is the best explanation for the development of constitutional monarchy in England during this period.