Which of the following statements BEST summarizes the impact of the Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AIt was a victory for slavery advocates in the South and invalidated the Missouri Compromise. %0D%0AIt was a victory for slavery advocates in the South and invalidated the Missouri Compromise. %0D%0A%0D%0AIt further intensified the struggles in the West over allowing free African Americans to settle there. %0D%0AIt further intensified the struggles in the West over allowing free African Americans to settle there. %0D%0A%0D%0AIt allowed abolitionists the opportunity to establish an antislavery platform as law. %0D%0AIt allowed abolitionists the opportunity to establish an antislavery platform as law. %0D%0A%0D%0AIt opened the door for the South to question other laws passed by Congress.
It was a victory for slavery advocates in the South and invalidated the Missouri Compromise.
The statement that BEST summarizes the impact of the Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) is:
"It was a victory for slavery advocates in the South and invalidated the Missouri Compromise."
The best summary of the impact of the Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) is: "It was a victory for slavery advocates in the South and invalidated the Missouri Compromise."
To arrive at this answer, we first need to understand the background of the case. Dred Scott, an enslaved African American, was taken by his owner to free territories and states where slavery was prohibited. Scott sued for his freedom, arguing that his residence in free territories made him a free man.
The Supreme Court, in its decision, ruled against Dred Scott. The Court held that enslaved African Americans were not considered citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. Furthermore, the Court stated that the Missouri Compromise, which had prohibited slavery in certain territories, was unconstitutional and invalid because it violated the Fifth Amendment property rights of slave owners.
The decision had significant consequences. It was seen as a victory for slavery advocates in the South because it reinforced the idea that enslaved African Americans were property and strengthened the institution of slavery. The ruling also invalidated the Missouri Compromise, which had attempted to maintain a balance between free and slave states. This decision effectively opened up previously prohibited territories to the expansion of slavery, intensifying the conflicts over allowing free African Americans to settle in these areas.
In summary, the Supreme Court's decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford was a victory for slavery proponents in the South, invalidated the Missouri Compromise, and escalated the struggles over allowing free African Americans to settle in the western territories.